Boundedly rational patients? Part 2: Health and patient mistakes in a behavioral framework

Authors

  • Ada C. Stefanescu Schmidt Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School
  • Ami B. Bhatt Outpatient Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Professor at Harvard Medical School
  • Cass R. Sunstein Robert Walmsley University, Professor at Harvard University

Keywords:

Cognitive Reflections Test, patient-reported outcomes measurement information system, System 1 and System 2, nudges

Abstract

We present the results of a randomized-assignment experiment that shows that patients perform very poorly on the Cognitive Reflection Test and thus are overwhelmingly in a System 1 state prior to a physician visit. Assigning patients the task of completing patient-reported outcomes measures immediately prior to the visit had a small numerical, but not statistically significant, shift towards a reflective frame of mind. We describe hypotheses to explain poor performance by patients, which may be due to anxiety, a bandwidth tax, or a scarcity effect, and outline further direction for study. Understanding the behavioral sources of errors on the part of patients in their interactions with physicians and in their decision-making is necessary to implement measures improve shared decision-making, patient experience, and (perhaps above all) clinical outcomes.

Published

2024-09-17